RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crohn's disease (CD) is characterised by the expansion of mesenteric adipose tissue (MAT), named creeping fat (CF), which seems to be directly related to disease activity. Adipose-stem cells (ASCs) isolated from the CF of patients with CD are extremely pro-inflammatory, which persists during disease remission. We hypothesised that the dysfunctional ASCs in CD accumulate epigenetic modifications triggered by the inflammatory environment that could serve as molecular markers. METHODS: Genome-wide DNA methylome and transcriptome profiling were performed in ASCs isolated from MAT adipose-tissue biopsies of patients with active and inactive disease and from non-Crohn's disease patients (non-CD). A validation cohort was used to test the main candidate genes via qPCR in other fat depots and immune cells. RESULTS: We found differences in DNA-methylation and gene expression between ASCs isolated from patients with CD and from non-CD subjects, but we found no differences related to disease activity. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that oxidative stress and immune response were significantly enriched in active CD and integration analysis identified MAB21L2, a cell fate-determining gene, as the most affected gene in CD. Validation analysis confirmed the elevated gene expression of MAB21L2 in MAT and in adipose tissue macrophages in active CD. We also found a strong association between expression of the calcium channel subunit gene CACNA1H and disease remission, as CACNA1H expression was higher in ASCs and MAT from patients with inactive CD, and correlates negatively with C-reactive protein in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. CONCLUSION: We identified a potential gene signature of CD in ASCs obtained from MAT. Integration analysis highlighted two novel genes demonstrating a negative correlation between promoter DNA methylation and transcription: one linked to ASCs in CD (MAB21L2) and the other (CACNA1H) related to disease remission.
RESUMEN
Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC) but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF. Objectives: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Results: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi and 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4% in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. Conclusion: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: Patients from the ENEIDA registry treated consecutively with infliximab and a subcutaneous anti-TNF (or vice versa), naïve to other biological agents, were identified and grouped according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF into IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). RESULTS: Overall, 473 UC patients were included (330 IVi, 143 SCi). Clinical response at week 14 was 42.7% and 48.3% in the IVi and SCi groups (non-statistically significant), respectively. Clinical remission rates at week 52 were 32.8% and 31.4%, in the IVi and SCi groups (nonsignificant differences), respectively. A propensity-matched score analysis showed a higher clinical response rate at week 14 in the SCi group and higher treatment persistence in the IVi group. Regarding long-term outcomes, dose escalation and discontinuation due to the primary failure of the first anti-TNF and more severe disease activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were inversely associated with clinical remission. CONCLUSION: The use of a second anti-TNF for UC seems to be reasonable in terms of efficacy, although it is particularly reduced in the case of the primary failure of the first anti-TNF. Whether the second anti-TNF is infliximab or subcutaneous does not seem to affect efficacy.
Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents. Data from the ENEIDA registry Background: Infliximab seems to be the most efficacious of the three available anti-TNF agents for ulcerative colitis (UC), but little is known when it is used as the second anti-TNF.
